ABSTRACT
Nirmatrelvir is an antiviral drug that, in combination with ritonavir, is an effective agent for the etiotropic therapy of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. The aim of the study was to evaluate bioequivalence of the generic drug nirmatrelvir Arpaxel in combination with ritonavir and the original drug Paxlovid, which is a combination of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, in a single dose administration to healthy volunteers.Materials and methods. This research was an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover bioequivalence study. It included 2 periods, in each of which the volunteers received either a test drug (nirmatrelvir at the dose of 300 mg) in combination with ritonavir (100 mg), or a reference drug (a combination of nirmatrelvir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg), given as a single dose. A wash-out period between each of the administrations was 7 days. The blood sampling to determine the concentration of nirmatrelvir was carried out in the range from 0 to 36 h in each of the study periods. A nirmatrelvir concentration was determined by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method with a lower quantitation limit of 10 ng/mL. Bioequivalence was assessed by comparing 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means of AUC(0-36) and Cmax of the test drug and reference drugs with the established equivalence limits of 80.00-125.00%.Results. In the study were included 68 healthy volunteers, 67 participants of which were included in the bioequivalence population. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs were comparable to each other. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the geometric mean of the maximum drug concentration in the blood plasma and the area under the pharmacokinetic curve << concentration-time >> from zero to the last blood draw within 36 hours of nirmatrelvir was 87.26-100.83 and 93.27-103.74%, which meets the criteria for assessing bioequivalence. The test drugs were well tolerated by the volunteers. The incidence of adverse events was similar for the test and reference drugs. No serious adverse events were recorded during the entire study.Conclusion. As a result of this study, bioequivalence of the test and reference drugs has been established.
ABSTRACT
Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olokizumab in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe coronavirus disease COVID-19. Material and methods. A multicenter non-interventional retrospective study of olokizumab treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was conducted. The initial population in this study included 2926 patients with COVID-19. Patients with moderate or severe disease who were taking corticosteroids as part of standard therapy were selected for this analysis. The final population was 1738 patients. A test group (standard therapy: corticosteroids, antiviral, pathogenetic or symptomatic therapy in combination with olokizumab) and a comparison group (standard therapy only) were formed. Each group included 869 patients. The primary end point was all-cause mortality from the start of anti-inflammatory therapy to the end of follow-up. We also analyzed the incidence of transfer and the length of stay of patients in the intensive care unit, the duration of hospitalization, as well as the change in C-reactive protein level. Results and discussion. It was found that olokizumab significantly reduces the all-cause mortality compared with standard therapy: 54 (6.21%) cases compared with 111 (12.77%) in the control arm, p<0.001, odds ratio (OR) 2.21 [1.57;3.1]. The results of factor analysis confirmed that olokizumab increases the odds of recovery, OR 2.41 (95% CI 1.64-3.54, p<0.001). In addition, patients in olokizumab group showed significantly lower plasma CRP levels compared with control group. Already on the 2nd day after the start of therapy the CRP level was almost 2 times lower in the olokizumab group than in the control group (the median was 13 [5.6;28.55] mg/l and 25 [15.3;79.25] mg/L in the olokizumab and comparison groups, respectively). Conclusion. The results of the study confirm the clinical data on the efficacy of olokizumab as therapy for COVID-19 patients.Copyright © 2022 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Molnupiravir is one of the drugs for the etiotropic therapy of a new coronavirus infection COVID-19. It has confirmed its clinical efficacy in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate COVID-19, including those who are at high risk of progressing to severe disease. The aim of the study was to evaluate bioequivalence of the generic drug molnupiravir ALARIO-TL and the original drug Lagevrio with a single oral administration in healthy volunteers. Materials and methods. This bioequivalence study was an open, randomized, two-period crossover study. In each of the two periods, volunteers received a single dose of the test drug, or reference drug molnupiravir, in the form of capsules at the dose of 200 mg. The washout period between the doses was 3 days. To determine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and bioequivalence, the concentration the concentration of N-hydrozycytidine (NHC), the main molnupiravir metabolit in the blood plasma of volunteers was evaluated. The blood plasma sampling was carried out in the range from 0 to 16 hours in each of the study periods. Bioequivalence was assessed by comparing 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means of AUC(0-16) and Cmax of the test drug and reference drugs with the established equivalence limits of 80.00 - 125.00%. Results. A total of 28 healthy male volunteers were included in the study. According to the results of the statistical analysis, after the administration of the test and reference drugs, the 90% CIs for the ratio of the geometric means of AUC (0-16) and Cmax were 96.31% - 113.64% and 91.37% - 114.8%, respectively. These intervals fit within the established limits of 80.00-125.00%, which confirms the bioequivalence of the drugs. When comparing the frequency of the individual adverse events registration, no significant differences were found out after the administration of the test and reference drugs. Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the test and reference drugs of molnupiravir are bioequivalent. In addition, the data obtained indicate that the drugs have similar safety profiles.Copyright © 2022 Volgograd State Medical University, Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Finding effective and safe medicines to fight SARS-CoV-2 infection is an urgent task. RPH-137 is an original trap fusion protein against SARS-CoV-2 virus. It comprises the angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 extracellular domain and the human IgG1 Fc fragment. The aim of the study was to carry out a preclinical evaluation of the efficacy of RPH-137 and molnupiravir against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Material(s) and Method(s): the authors analysed RPH-137 expressed in a stable CHO cell line and molnupiravir used as an active pharmaceutical ingredient. Drug-mediated inhibition of virus-induced cytotoxicity was assessed in Vero cell culture. In vivo efficacy assessments were performed in Syrian hamsters. The animals were infected intranasally with SARS-CoV-2 (PIK35 clinical isolate) in the dose of 5 log TCID50. The authors evaluated body weight measurements, lung-body weight ratios, and lung histopathology findings and determined viral RNA levels in oropharyngeal swabs by RT-PCR using the amplification cycle threshold (Ct). The statistical analyses involved one- and two-way ANOVA, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney test. Result(s): RPH-137 and molnupiravir inhibited the cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero cells;the EC50 values of RPH-137 amounted to 4.69 mug/mL (21.3 nM) and 16.24 mug/mL (73.8 nM) for 50 TCID50 and 200 TCID50, respectively, whereas the EC50 values of molnupiravir were 0.63 mug/mL (1900 nM) for both doses. Intramuscular RPH-137 (30 and 80 mg/kg) had no effect on the infection process in Syrian hamsters. The comparison with the challenge control group showed that intraperitoneal RPH-137 (100 mg/kg) had statistically significant effects on a number of parameters, including a 27% reduction in inflammation and a 30% reduction in the total lesion area of the lungs by Day 7. Intragastric molnupiravir (300 mg/kg twice daily) significantly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion(s): both RPH-137 and molnupiravir inhibited the cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero cells. In Syrian hamsters, molnupiravir demonstrated a more pronounced inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 than RPH-137. However, RPH-137 had statistically significant effects on a range of parameters. This offers additional perspectives for further research.Copyright © 2023 Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Finding effective and safe medicines to fight SARS-CoV-2 infection is an urgent task. RPH-137 is an original trap fusion protein against SARS-CoV-2 virus. It comprises the angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 extracellular domain and the human IgG1 Fc fragment. The aim of the study was to carry out a preclinical evaluation of the efficacy of RPH-137 and molnupiravir against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Materials and methods: the authors analysed RPH-137 expressed in a stable CHO cell line and molnupiravir used as an active pharmaceutical ingredient. Drug-mediated inhibition of virus-induced cytotoxicity was assessed in Vero cell culture. In vivo efficacy assessments were performed in Syrian hamsters. The animals were infected intranasally with SARS-CoV-2 (PIK35 clinical isolate) in the dose of 5 log TCID50. The authors evaluated body weight measurements, lung-body weight ratios, and lung histopathology findings and determined viral RNA levels in oropharyngeal swabs by RT-PCR using the amplification cycle threshold (Ct). The statistical analyses involved one- and two-way ANOVA, Student's t-test, and Mann–Whitney test. Results: RPH-137 and molnupiravir inhibited the cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero cells;the EC50 values of RPH-137 amounted to 4.69 μg/mL (21.3 nM) and 16.24 μg/mL (73.8 nM) for 50 TCID50 and 200 TCID50, respectively, whereas the EC50 values of molnupiravir were 0.63 μg/mL (1900 nM) for both doses. Intramuscular RPH-137 (30 and 80 mg/kg) had no effect on the infection process in Syrian hamsters. The comparison with the challenge control group showed that intraperitoneal RPH-137 (100 mg/kg) had statistically significant effects on a number of parameters, including a 27% reduction in inflammation and a 30% reduction in the total lesion area of the lungs by Day 7. Intragastric molnupiravir (300 mg/kg twice daily) significantly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions: both RPH-137 and molnupiravir inhibited the cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero cells. In Syrian hamsters, molnupiravir demonstrated a more pronounced inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 than RPH-137. However, RPH-137 had statistically significant effects on a range of parameters. This offers additional perspectives for further research.
ABSTRACT
The aim of the article is to study pharmacokinetic characteristics of intravenous olokizumab in patients with moderate COVID-19 to relieve a hyperinflammation syndrome. Materials and methods. The pharmacokinetic study was conducted as a part of a phase III clinical study (RESET, NCT05187793) on the efficacy and safety of a new olokizumab regimen (intravenous, at the doses of 128 mg or 256 mg) in COVID-19 patients. Plasma concentrations of olokizumab were determined by the enzyme immunoassay. The population analysis was performed using a previously developed pharmacokinetic model based on a linear two compartment. Results. The pharmacokinetic analysis included the data from 8 moderate COVID-19 patients who had been administrated with olokizumab intravenously at the dose of 128 mg. According to the analysis results in this population, there was an increase in the drug clearance, compared with the data obtained in healthy volunteers and the patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 0.435, 0.178 and 0.147 l/day, respectively. The parameters analysis within the framework of a population pharmacokinetic model showed that the main factors for the increased olokizumab clearance are a high body mass index. In addition, the presence of COVID-19 itself is an independent factor in increasing the drug clearance. Conclusion. After the intravenous olokizumab administration, an increase in the drug clearance is observed in moderate COVID-19 patients against the background of the disease course. The main contribution to the increased clearance is made by the characteristics of the population of COVID-19 patients associated with the risk of a severe disease and inflammation. When administered intravenously at the dose of 128 mg, a therapeutically significant olokizumab level was maintained throughout the acute disease phase for 28 days. Copyright © 2022 Volgograd State Medical University, Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aim – to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olokizumab in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe coronavirus disease COVID-19. Material and methods. A multicenter non-interventional retrospective study of olokizumab treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was conducted. The initial population in this study included 2926 patients with COVID-19. Patients with moderate or severe disease who were taking corticosteroids as part of standard therapy were selected for this analysis. The final population was 1738 patients. A test group (standard therapy: corticosteroids, antiviral, pathogenetic or symptomatic therapy in combination with olokizumab) and a comparison group (standard therapy only) were formed. Each group included 869 patients. The primary end point was all-cause mortality from the start of anti-inflammatory therapy to the end of follow-up. We also analyzed the incidence of transfer and the length of stay of patients in the intensive care unit, the duration of hospitalization, as well as the change in C-reactive protein level. Results and discussion. It was found that olokizumab significantly reduces the all-cause mortality compared with standard therapy: 54 (6.21%) cases compared with 111 (12.77%) in the control arm, p<0.001, odds ratio (OR) 2.21 [1.57;3.1]. The results of factor analysis confirmed that olokizumab increases the odds of recovery, OR 2.41 (95% CI 1.64–3.54, p<0.001). In addition, patients in olokizumab group showed significantly lower plasma CRP levels compared with control group. Already on the 2nd day after the start of therapy the CRP level was almost 2 times lower in the olokizumab group than in the control group (the median was 13 [5.6;28.55] mg/l and 25 [15.3;79.25] mg/L in the olokizumab and comparison groups, respectively). Conclusion. The results of the study confirm the clinical data on the efficacy of olokizumab as therapy for COVID-19 patients. © 2022 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Favipiravir has demonstrated efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in several preliminary studies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of favipiravir for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in outpatients and hospitalized patients. We conducted an open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial of a generic form of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 confirmed by PCR-test. Eligible patients (18-60 years) after stratification were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to receive either favipiravir (1800 mg BID on day 1, followed by 800 mg BID for up to 9 days), or standard of care (SOC) treatment (umifenovir + intranasal interferon alpha-2b, or hydroxychloroquine) for up to 10 days. The co-primary outcomes were the time to clinical improvement and the time to viral clearance. Among 190 patients assessed for eligibility 168 were randomized to favipiravir (n=112) or to SOC (n=56) group. The median time to clinical improvement was 6.0 days (IQR 4.0;9.3) in the favipiravir group and 10.0 (IQR 5.0;21.0) days in the SOC group;the median difference was 4 days (HR 1.63;95% CI 1.14-2.34;P=0.007). The statistically significant difference in the median time to viral clearance was observed only for hospitalized patients: 3.0 (IQR 3.0;3.0) days in the favipiravir group vs. 5.0 (IQR 4.5;5.5) days in the SOC group (HR 2.11;95% CI 1.04-4.31;P=0.038). The rate of viral elimination on Day 5 in the favipiravir group was significantly higher than in SOC group: 81.2% vs. 67.9% (RR 1.22;05% CI 1.00-1.48;P=0.022). The rate of clinical improvement on Day 7 in the favipiravir group was 1.5-fold higher than in SOC group: 52.7% vs. 35.8% (RR 1.50;95% CI 1.02-2.22;P=0.020). Favipiravir was well-tolerated and the most common adverse reactions were asymptomatic hyperuricemia, transient elevation of ALT & AST, and mild gastrointestinal disorders. Favipiravir was superior to the SOC in shortening the time to clinical improvement in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.